Page 1 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
Full Size
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
s?l*6. ^ -m ■a •- ■■■ ■ ■† miian —* m runs atrai 5-5! BT SHERWOOD & LONG. & jFamilB TSTrtospaper—JBebotefc to literature, &grieultUTe, manufactures, Commrrr?, atrti IfcisccUaneouB iEUabing. TERMS—$2.00 IN ADVANC*. VOL. XXIII. GREENSBOEOTJGH, IN". C, MA.Y 11, 1B60. NO. 10864 The LrcensboTangK Patriot. ».»■ «OF-BWOOD. JAMES A. LCM1. SHERWOOD & LONG, EDITORS AND PROPRIETORS. TEBMSt *2.4X> A YEAR, IW ADVAKCE. KATES OF ADVERTISING IN THE PATRIOT. fts-S dollar per square for the first week, and twenty- . ceo'* t' r cvery week ,hereftfter- TWKLVB LINES oa .. making u square. Deductions made in faror of .• ;::.g matter as follows: 3 MONTHS. 6 MONTHS. 1 1MB :.-:^:::::::-^».^SS::::::?SS '..;.:..... 10 00 15 00 20 00 Discussion at Smilhfield Between Messrs. Pool and Ellis! GREAT ENTHUSIASM ! POQli TRIUMPHANT, AND ELLIS COMPLETELY USED UP ! From the Raleigh Register. The candidates for governor met at Smith-ed'on the 25th, according to appointment. ' }ir. Po 1 opened the discussion by congrat- _• himself that a new state of affairs lately arisen, heretofore unprocented.— . competitor and himself had agreed that iiscussion between them was narrowed to the simple question of ad valorem • subject of ad valorem is easily unier- . | it has been called by some a compli- | juostion, but all who know right irora og,are bound to admit that equal taxa- . is just and right. What but the strong arm of government secures to men the en-lit and possession of their property, ier slaves or not? And why should rv man pay his equai proportion for port of that government? Every cit-ighl to pay tax according to the val-i and protection afforded his property.— To adjust the matter and to bring about e-zation in the taxation fcs the prime ob- • of thoso who favor ad valorem; but me political screws ar o once placed on of our people it is hard to convnee -in oi the eror of their wa y, and influence in to advocate this measure, although ov-rv honest man is bound to admit its justice. . present system of taxation is certainly unjust and unequal—wo propose to change it > as to make it boar equally on all species of property, the r.egro included. It is no v.- proposition-—ad valorem taxation is ■..;,!• obligatory in sixorsoven oftheSouth-u States, that -enjoy more property than seio—they have dono away with discrimi- .•'•.-.• and unjust taxation, while in North Jarolina we cannot tax slaves, known and acknowledge to be|the most valuable species of • srty among us, except as persons The Aborftionists say they are persons, I sav ey are property, and should, as such, be .' i :ioeordi ng to value. With these facts | ■•'. IJV * houhd not the slaveholder pay ial pnjbortion with the landholder and • or man for the support of tho govern-ment and t'ae protection ol his property ?— ii's platform proposes to bear equally on all apocies ofproperty, tin cups and the old lady'u hon and eggs, and all, except the rich man's negro, while wo propose to tax lOdy according to value, giving pow-tho legislature to "discriminate only r of the natural products of our land • •industrial pursuits of our citizens." competitor says that wo represent onr- 08 wishing to tax the negro in onescc- 1 other species of property in anoth- I give this, as it deserves, a prompt de- 1 am in lavor of striking out tho odi-bibition in regard to slaves in the Con- Btitution, and of taxing all property accord-value, leaving it to the legislature to Bach discriminations as beforo men- I \Y, are not hunting down the ne- • are protecting tho slave, owner in session of his property and making • memting a fraternal bond between slaveholder and non-slaveholder. But life has a different tax for each class iety. What more security for the pro-of his property does the slave owner than that his negro shall be taxed '.;•' in protection with the land which tills? N'oii-slaveholbers arc largely in lajority here, and slaves are held by th their consent. Thoy should not, fore, be oppressed with onerous and un- • irdens of taxation. Their good will >i»I<J be conciliated and courted, and if e, they can march to tho defence of your •- property with a much, better grace "loaderthe present system of unequal "- >n. A great hue and cry has been ■ by the Democracy that the Opposi i wish to tax tin cups, See., and send a •■ ".nil to look into everybody's smoke- • • and under everybody's bed. Your I >nuaoo sense, gentleman, will enable • know this to bo an intentional per- >io« of the Opposition platform. Such is ttheplatform—not my position. ■ '■ †Ellis nude a speech in Raleigh behind k, when 1 had no power of defending '. in which he has entirely (uninten- • •. I hope) misrepresented my position, • further, he has printed and circulated it "• •« ■•-; over the State. The legislature power to discriminate in favor ot the • I products of the State. Of what do .•' "tisist '. Why, ot tho articles of corn, '■•«••. and what is raised in tho State '•■! actual support of tho raiser. We • to l «ter home industry, and show be- 1 '•' ■ avit, that equalization in taxation is ••.•' competitor in his late great Raleigh *chpredicted that "beforo the summer's tood erect in the heavens we would our jilatforin as rats flee a burning 1 stand on the platform and will low the Governor from the Seaboard to ■ mountainson it. I would like to know '«Wanda on his platform? " * .' ' ul»s> egg3. and soap gourds prop-so. according to the Democratic principle of ad valorem is fully explained to them they can discriminate between justice and injustice, and will accordingly record their names at tho ballot-box. Any slave holder who is an honest man is willing to Eay his equal proportion of taxation. I now the people of my section well enough to be certain of the fact that they have too much magnanimity to refuse to do so. Wo do not propose to raise the tax on ne-groes to the tremendous amount talked of by our opponents. The tax will go-up per-haps six cents, but we must remember that we also propose to tax negroes over fifty years and under twelve, which will lessen the burdens which the poor man now has to bear. Negroes under 12 are valuable—in fact, the most valuable of property—those over fifty are not only useful but necessary on a farm. The negro, from birth, increases every year more than 25 per cent in value. We propose to bring down tho tax on land from twenty cents on tho hundred dollars valuation to 10 cents, and to raise the tax on the negro from 6 to 10 cents on the same. We must raise taxes—we are bound to pay the debts that are daily accumulating, and I ask why not do it fairly ? Why shall not my neighbor stand on the same footing with me in paying taxes as well as at the ballot box? If this proposition (i e) ad valorem is to drive negroes out of the State, where will they go ? to South Carolina, where they are already taxed, per cxpita, more than this sys-tem could possibly impose upon them ?— Suppose the owners emigrate—leave our State with their negroes. If they do, they "leave their country for their country's good,''if they do so to shirk equal taxation. Shall a discrimination be made between the rich slave owner and the man who daily earns his support by the sweat of his brow 1 I do not wish to array one class of persons against the other, but I say that by the pres-ent system the poor man is oppressed, The rich planter sends his cotton to a commission merchant and on it he pays no tax, while the working man is obliged to pay fifty cents on the hundred on his sugar, coffee, and other necessaries of life; in fact, on everything ho buys or sells. lie has no commission mer-chant. Is this right ? Is it just ? Mr. Pool went on to say that Mr. Bledsoo had said that in this contest there would undoubtedly be some i'speeial pleadiug"—he had so advis-ed the Governor. The Governor might try to split hairs on the question, but ho was wil-ling to meet him, nevertheless. Why should tho slaveholder be so careful in regard to his negroes when ho has his luxuries, and is wil-ling to pay for them? The eternal cry is, however, ''let my ?iegroes alone." Those who are in favor of the principle of ad valorem, but try to make it a question of time, are the enemies of Gov. Ellis. Why should anything that is right be postponed ? Shall we wait for the Abolitionists to allow us to throw off tho tyranny of unequal taxation ? You let the non-slaveholder know that the slave own-er is revelling in his luxuries, paying no tax, while he pays an onorous tax on his necessi-ties, and you at once bring about a prejudice between them, a conflict as it were. We may have to fight for our slave property. We can and must call on the non-slaveholder.— They will fight for the instution and protect your property; is it right, therefore, to im-pose upon them this comparatively burden-some tax, and take advantage of this little constitutional advantage ? I call upon slave-holders to come forward and cement the bond of Union. Georgia and Arkansas, and other Southern States have strengthened tho insti-tution of slavery by adopting the ad valorem system. The non-slaveholder asks for equal taxation, cries aloud for his rights, and this is all. Tho "Standard" sometimes makes an ob-servation that is worthy of credit; it is, how-ever, not my organ. Mr. llolden says ad va-lorem is just right and Democratic, and that Gov.Reidwas its originator in this State. This is high Democratic authority, but I say if you wish to get ad valorem you should vote for the man and party who offers it to you now. Perhaps, Gov. Ellis' party may give it to you, but it will be long beforo his time arrives. I am in favor of having a fair, hon-est discussion of a great andjust principle. Mr. Pool stated that the constitution be-longed to tho people, and the people had a right to change it; that ho had no fears of trouble in an open convention; that the West only asked that slaves should be taxed as oth-er other proporty—that he would leave all discrimination as recognized in the platform to the legislature. He would be glad to an-swer any question which Gov. Ellis or tho people might propound. He then took his seat amidst deafening applause. Gov. Ellis then arose and said that it was the first time he had over had the honor of ap-pearing before a Johnston audience, except as an officer of the law—ho now appeared as tho representative of the great Democratic party. Ho tendered his thanks for generous support he had received at their hands at the last election. The ad valorem system he con-sidered not only unjust, but revolutionary and tyrannicle in its theory, practice and in-fluence— he was, with the platferm he sup-ported, diametrically opposed to it—he was a poor nan and Mr. Pool had not convinced him that the establishment of this system was to his interest—The West is continually crying for more, when when she already has enough. The compromises made between the two sections should be kept inviolate. Tho Opposition are always changing their positions.and every time they come before the people they bring their new issues. They u • -. wrm, they can now bo taxed, and the •'/•■: negro left out entirely. Now, I "-to know which is the tin cup party ; | "the tin cap candidate? lieu -• °> fellow citizens: If my corapt leave it to competitor is '"-•tin cup candidate how can he stand j"ly on his platform? The Democracy Wt,. ' 'lu8t in lhe eyeB °f 8°m6 of the * °wat of our people, but when this great are already leaving their platform, in fact they put in new planks very often, He be-lieved with Mr. Fercbee, of Camden, that it was a bad sign to see the Abolitionists sym-pathizing with ad valorem. He said that Gov. Raid's ad valorem was not that of the Opposition, that the object of this move on their part, was merely to gain power, and closed by urging the people to vote the Dem-ocratic ticket, let the Constitution alone, and save the country from tho dangers which be-set its infringement. Mr. Pool, in his rejoin-der, said Gov. Ellis had not met his positions. That the platform was explicit enough, and was willing to leave discrimination, in regard to ccr :ain subjects of taxation, to the enlight-ened representatives of a great State. Tho legislature is not now trammelled, nor do I propose to do it. Tho pamphlet which tho Governor has called a"dark lantorn concern" was intended to give light, and contains high Democratic authority in favor of the great princiolo of equal taxation, nor has he denied that Messrs. Holden, Bledsoe, Wigfall and others did use the expressions therein con-tained. Gov. Ellis replied. He said that his competitor was constantly leaving his platform—that it was too slippery for him to stand on. He (Mr. Pool) was in favor of an open convention, and the platform had not limited the power of that body. Once trust the Constitution in its hands, and we have no guarantee that;it will not be torn asunder; said ho was in favor of the extension of a railroad through to the Tennessee line. Convention Proceedings on Monday April SO. SEVENTH DAY—MOENINO SE8SION. The Convention came to order at 10.15 A. M. The Rev Mr. Dana of the 2d Presbyteri-ian church of Charleston opened with prayer. Reading of Journal dispensed with. After explanation from Messrs. Pngh, Barkdlae and the Chairman were made, a vote by States was then taken on the amendment ot Mr. Butler, of Massachusetts, viz : the Cincinnatti platform. Pending this vote, the following proceed-ings and vote took place: State*. Yea*. Xayt. Maine 3 6 New Hampshire, 0 •> Vermont 0 6 Massachusetts, 8 6 Rhode Island 0 _ '.. 4 Connecticut, -.2} 3* New York, 0 36 Xew Jesey, .. 5 - ■ Pennsylvania 16* 10} Delaware 8 02 Maryland 5£ 2* Virginia 121 2* North Carolina, 10T O South Carolina, 0 8 Georgia 10 0 Florida 2 3 Louisiana, 0 6 Mississippi, 0 7 Texas, 0 4 Arkansas, 0 4 Missouri, 4} 4J Tennessee, 11 * Kentucky 9 3 Ohio, 0 23 Indina 0 13 Illinois, .0 11 Michigan, '. 0 11 Wisconsin, 0 5 Iowa 0 4 Minnesota, lj 2} California, 0 4 Oregon, 3 0 105 198 The above result gave rise to a warm and somewhat excited discussion in reference to the vote of Georgia, and the debate became personally offensive, when the chair inter-posed. The question was then taken on the minor-ity resolutions of Mr. Samuels as a substi-tute for that of tho majority, and carried by the following vote : State*. Yeas. -Vayi. Maine 8 0 New Hampshire, 6 0 Vermont, 5 0 Massachusetts, 7 0 Rhode Island 4 0 Connecticut, 6 0 New York, 35 0 Yew Jersey 6 * Pennsylvania 12 15 Deleware, 0 J Maryland 3J 4J Virginia, 1 14 North Carolina 0 10 South Carolina 0 8 Georgia, 0 10 Florida 2 3 Alabama, 0 9 Louisiana, 0 6 Mississippi, 0 7 Texas 0 4 Arkansas, 0 4 Missouri, 4 6 Tennessee, 1 11 Kentucky, 2 9} Ohio, 23 0 Indiana 13 0 Illinois 11 0 Michigan, 6 0 Wisconsin, 5 0 Iowa, 4 9 Minnesota, 4 0 California, 0 4 Oregon, 0 3 165 138 When the vote was announced carrying the substitute of Mr. Samuels. Mr. Stuart, of Michigan, moved to recon-sider and lay the motion on the table. The chair roversed his previous decision favoring a similar motion. He had changed his views and decided tho motion to be out of order. Mr. Saulsbury, of Deleware wanted to ex-plain what would be the obvious effect of one of these resolutions. Mr. McCook of Ohio objected. Mr. Salisbury was ruled out of order. The chair decided, the resolutions to be dovisible. Mr. Flournoy would publish what he would have said if he had not been called to order. Tho question was then taken on the first resolutions as follows: 1. Resolved, That wo, the Democracy of tho Union, in Covention assembled,hereby do-clare our affirmance of tho resolutions unan-imously adopted and declared as a platform of principles by the Democratic Convention at Cincinnatti, in the year 1856, believing that Democratic principles are unchangea-ble in their nature, when applied to the same subject matters. It was carried as follows : States. Yeas. Kays. Maine 8 2 New Hampshire 5 0 Vermont 5 0 Massachusetts, 13 0 Rhode Island, 4 O Connecticut, 0 0 New York 35 0 New Jersey, 7 0 Pennsylvania, 27 0 Delaware, 2 1 Maryland 5 3 Virginia, 14 1 North Carolina 10 0 South Carolina, 0 8 Georgia, 0 10 Florida, 0 3 Alabama 0 9 Louisiana, 0 6 Missippi, 0 7 Texas 0 4 Arkansas, 0 4 Missouri, 7J 1} Tennessee, 10} 1} Kentucky 12 0 Ohio, 23 0 Indiana, 13 0 Illinois, 11 0 Michigan, ~..6 0 Wisconsin 6 0 Iowa, 4 0 Minnesota, 4 0 California, } 3} Oregon, 0 3 237} 65 Mr. Glenn, in casting the vote ofMississpi- South Carolina 0 8 Georgia 0 0 Florida 0 0 Alabama 0 0 Louisiana 0 0 Mississippi 0 0 Texas 0 0 Arkansas 0 0 Missouri 4 5 Tenncsse 0 12 Kentucky 4 8 Ohio 0 23 Indiana 0 13 Illinois 0 11 Michigan 0 6 Wisconsin 0 5 Iowa 0 4 Minnesta 0 4 Calfornia .0 4 Oregon 0 3 21 238 Pending tho call of the roll, Mr Bradbur-ry, of Maine, desired to preface the vote of Maine with a speech, but he was called to order. Pending the call of the roll, nearly the en-tire North changed their votes from the af-firmative to tho negative. (It was a com-plete back down from their former position.) Mr. Gallagher, of Connecticut, wanted to know what was the dodge. (Laughter.) Mr. Benning, of Georgia, said his State de-clined to vote. Mr. Seward said he voted "no." Mr. M'Cook, of Ohio, insisted upon. Ala-bama being required to voto. Mr. Walker, of Alabama, made an inaudi-ble reply. His State declined to vote. Arkansas, Texas, Florida, Mississippi and Louisiana, also declined to vote. Mr. Stuart called for a division on the re-maining propositions, and a vote by States. The vote was then taken on the following resolutions: Resolved That it is the duty of the United States to afford ample and complete protec-tion to all its citizens, whether at home or abroad, and whether native i r foreign., The roll was called, and it was carried unanimously, the States declining to vote on the last proposition, except Georgia, deelin-ing to vote on this, Mr. Stuart asked that the States that had declined voting be called, which was done, and they still declined. The vote was then taken on the following resolution: Resolved, That one of the necessities of the age, in a military, commercial and and postal point of view, is speed3r communica-tion between the Atlantic and Pacific States; and the Democratic party pledged such con-stitutional Government aid as will insure tho construction ofa railroad to the Pacific coast, at the earliest practicable period. It was carried by a vote of 248 ayes to 220} nays. The Southern States, before declining to vote, still doing so. pi, said the Cincinnati platform was a swin-dle. Mr. Bryan, of texas, endorsed Mississippi, and cast the vote of texas "no." The debate now became very exciting, in-dicating bitter feelings and determined hos-tility when a motion to lay the resolutions on the table was submitted and decided by a vote of 81 against 188. During the call, Mr. Walker, of Alabama, withdrew the vote of his State. Mississippi withdrew her vote. Arkansas withdrew three of her votes. Mr. Ewing. of Tennessee, called for a sep-erate vote on the following preamble and resolutions: Inasmuch as differences of opinion exist in the Democratic party as to the nature and extent ofthe powers of a Territorial Legis-lature, and and as to the powers and duties of Congress, under the Constitution of the United States, over the institution ofslavery within the Territories. Resolved, that the Democratic party will abide by the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States on the questions of con-stitutional law. GOT. Winston, of Alabama, raised the point that tho vote had first to be taken on the res-olutions' then on the preamble. Baled to be not well taken. Mr. stuart, ot Michigan, said, if the gentle-man did not want the resolution, we of the North did not. Hon. Bedford Brown ofNew York warned his Northern friends not to adopt this pream-ble and resolution. It swept offevery barrier cfthe Constitution and would destroy the Democratic party and the country (great sen-sation.) Mr. Stuart of Michigan desired to speak a-raidst loud cries oforder. Hon. Wm. A. Richardson, of Illinois, de-sired to be heard. Mr. John Cochrane, of New York, hoped ho would be beard. Mr. Stuart, of Michigan, continued on the floor amidst loud cries of orer. Mr. Meek, of Alabama, insisted upon his being brought to order, Mr. Stewart had al-ready spoke once. Mr. Stuart said it would not be discovered whether he was in order until he first stated his proposition. , Mr. Hughs, of New Hampshier, moved all persons not Delegates be requested to with-draw from the floor. He excepted the la-dies. The Chair requested those not Delegates to retire to the rearof the room and not crowd the Delegates. Mr. Meek withdrew his point of order.— All Alabama wanted was a vote. Hon. Wm. A Richardson rose again to speak, but Mr. Hooker, of Mississippi, objected. The Chair ruled that the gentleman from Illinois was not in order. Mr. Stuart of Michigan moved an adjourn-ment untill 4 o' clock this afternoon. Mr. Cochrane appealed to the convention to hear Mr. Richardson. The Chair ordered Mr. Cochrane to take his seat. Mr. Stuart withdrew his motion. The convention then voted on the 2d re-solution and its preamble, aud it was reject-ed by the following votes.- States. Yea*. A'ays. Maine 0 8 New Hampshire, 1 4 Vermont 0 5 Massachusetts 0 13 Rhodes Island 4 0 Connecticut O B New York 0 35 New Jersey 0 7 Pennsylvania 8 19 Deleware 0 2 Maryland 0 8 Virginia 0 16 North Carolina 0. 10 the fol- Mr. McCook, of Ohio, moved to reconsider the vote, and to lay the motion on the table. Carried. The question was then taken on lowing resolution : Resolved, That the Domocratic party are in favor ot the acquisition of the Island of Cuba, on such terms as shall be honorable to ourselves and jnst to Spain. It passedlananimously, excepting the seven States declining to vote. Flournoy, of Arkansas, desired to cast the vote of his State. The last resolution wasthen voted, as fol-lows: 6. Resolved, That the enactments ofState Legislatures to defeat the faithful execution of the fugitive slave law, are hostile in char-acter, subversive of the Constitution, and revolutionary in their effect. It passed unanimously, all the State de-clining to vote that did beforo. So the minority platform reported by Mr. Samuels, with the exception of the 2d reso-lution aud its preamble, was adopted. Mr. Stuart moved to reconsider the vote adopting the last resolution, and proposed to address the convention. He had just begun his speech when our re-port closed. gia, J. B. Owens, Florida, G. M. Bryan, Texas, M. B. Burrows, Arkansas, T. L. Sueed Missouri, J. A. Green, New York. On motion, tho convention of the South-ern Delegation, and of the friends of Con-stitutional Union, was adjourned unti. 12 M. on Tuesday, 1st May. PROCEEDINGS OP THE SECEEDINO DELEGATES. The Charleston Courier furnishes the fol-lowing proceedings ol the Seceding Delegates ou Monday night: The greatest enthusiasm and excitement prevailed throughout our city on Monday afternoon, as soon as it was reported that some of the Southern States, by their dele-gations, had withdrawn from the Coven-tion, and were pieparing to meet in Con-ference. Citizens who had previously cared little or nothing for the Convention, now exhibited tho liveliest interest, and the 'South-ern Delegations" and "Southern Convention" on every tongue. A hurried appointment was made for a meeting of the retiring Delegations, in St. Andrew's Hall, (which had been procured through the application of Mayor Wood,) at 8 o'clock. Long before that hour the Hall and all its approaches were filied by an eager and expectant aasemolage, so that it was a diffi-cult matter for any of the Delegates invi-ted and included in the call to effect an en-trance. Large assemblages of citizens wore also gathered i j front of the City Hall and at other places, in expectation of addresses from popular leaders of the seceding Dele-gations, in explanation of this important movement. At 8 o'clock, in St. Andrew's Hall several appeals in behalf of order and regu-lar proceedings were made, by W. L. Yancey and others, ot the retiring Delega-gations and were heard with approval and applause. Tho meeting was called to order by Hen-ry D. Smith, a Delegate at Large from Alabama, who was followed by Mr. W. L. Yancey in a special request to all specta-tors and others, not Delegates, to withdraw eo as to leave the hall free for the organiza-tion. Mr. Y'ancoy then moved the appointment of Senator James A. Bayard a delegate from Delewaro as temporary Chairman, but Mr. Bayard begged to be excused on account of imperfect Hearing and want ol acquaintance with tho Delegates present. Mr. Yancey then moved that the Chair he assigned to John S. Preston, a Delegate from South Carolina, who was conducted to the Chair with great applause. Mr. G. Lubbock, of Texas, was appointed Secretary. Mr. Yancey then offered a few remarks, explaining tho object and purpose of the meeting, and urging deliberate and well con-sidered measures. Ho closed with a motion for the enrollment of the Delegates and Al-ternates included in the call, and the appoint-ment of a committee to report a permanent organization. He advocated moderation and conciliation. Tho call of the States was then commenced and proceeded with. On reach-ing New York, Dr. Skinner, of tho "Hard Shell" Delegation, responded in a few elo-quent words pledging his co-operation and the best wishes and efforts of his colleag-ueH. Mr. Bayard replied eloquently in behalf of Deleware. On the call for South Carolina Col. J. P. Boed (one of the threo Delegates who did n"t act with tho majority of Dele-gation in Democratic Convention) made an eloquent expression of his footings and rea-sons, and gave his signature and cordial co-operation. Mr. Reed was repeatedly inter-rupted by loud and continued cheering. Mr. Jefferson M. Lamar, of Georgia, re-p'ied promptly and eloquently to the call for Georgia. Gen. John Milton answered that "Florida is read}-," and was followed by Rev. James B. Gwens, in tho same strain.— Mr. N. B. Burrows, replied for Arkansas.— Mr. S B. Greenfiiid of tho Hopkinsville (Ky.) Democrat, rosponded to the call for Kentucky, and stated that his colleagues were under some restriction from instruction and he would only beg the privilegs of lon-ger consideration. Henry C Burnett of Kentucky, (M. H.R.) was then called on aid replied in an eloquent address. Tho Chairman then stated again the ob-jects of tho call and the meeting, and ex-presed an earnest desire that the business of tho meeting would not be interrupted by any call for speeches not strictly required by tho resolution before them. On the completion of tho call of the States it was found that Mayor Wood, ofNew York had appeared, and loud calls, were mad for "New lord," and "Wood." H briefly with From the Warrenton News. SINOULAB CA8E OF LARCENY For some time past considerable excite-ment has existed in Raleigh, relative to the larceny of a half-grown pig. Various reports were in circulation, more or less exaggera-ted, and considerable curiosity was excited to learn the particulars. The good character hitherto borne by the accused, and their pos-ition in society, made many incredulous as to the participation in so mean an action as stealing a poor man's little pig. The exam-ination took place last week, and our special reporter furnishes us with the following ab-stract of the Proceedings: Jack Register, Georgy E. Coon and Jacky Paddle, were brought before his honor, Jus-tice Rip Van Winkle charged with stealing a pig, the property of Mr Mosey, a respecta-ble citizen of Ram Cat, in Wake County. The accused wero three queer-looking specimens of the class known as dilapidated politicians, who, though they talkes as if "butter would'nt melt in their mouths," evidently knew a trick cr two, and discern, a hawk from a handsaw." Mr. Mosey was accompa-nied by his friend and adviser,, the celebra-ted Orator Gasbags, the gemmau vot creates a (sensation) and always (cheers) his own speeches. Mr. Mosey, who appeared to be depressed, being called on, stated that he had for nearly two years nourished a dear little animal of the porcine species, of more than oidinary intelligence, and which answered to the name of Ad. That he bad taken great trouble with it, and taught it to make a marked dis-tinction between white and black folks, beside various other little tricks which would make it very popular, and prove a mine of wealth to himself, and a tremendous saving to eve-rybody and his wife. But*all his brilliant hopes were blasted by the prisoners, who, without the slightest notice or authority, had pounced upon little Ad, and were al-ready exhibiting it all over tho country, as the Learned Opposition Pig. In conclusion, he besought his honor to give him back his dear little pig, that it was all he had in the world to make a start into business with, that he was utterly ruined unless these "rogues in grain" were made to disgorge their ill-got-ten plunder. In answer to a question from the Justice he stated that it was a genuine Southerno "no bone breed." When Mr. Mo-sey concluded, Orator Gasbags made two gasping attempts to address the Court but being overcome by the intensity of his feel-ings, and the magnitude of his ideas, he sat down wiping his physiognomy with the cuff ot his coat, as he patriotically declined to patronise Northern manufactures by making use of a pocket handkerchief. The prisoners, being asked what they had to say in answer to Mr. Mosey's statement Georgy Coon made a rambling "Cock and Bull store," abont an old sow, called Free Suffrage, that belonged to one Davy; which was the dam ol little Ad, and of course the latter could not bo the property of the com-plainant. That in law and fact it was an Estray, and belonged to any that could catch it, unless the real owner came forward, pro-ved property, and paid charges. There his Honor remarked, with a grin, that last item would be a serious one, as little Adhad kick-ed up the "Devil to pay," generally and in-dividually, aad his Satanic majesty was not easliy satisfied- Jack Register assured his Honor that he did'nt caro one "bawbee" for the Devil, the Eig, or the complainant. That he would ave been as well pleased if Mr. Mosey had his infernal pig back in Ram Cat, that at the best it was a vicious animal just as likoly to gore its friend as its foes, and ho apprehended, from present appearances, a little more liko-ly. That be had a strong dislike to hog-meat, and this loco foco shoat in particular. He solemnly protested ho was drawn inno-cently into tho affair by Mrs. Sally Dillard, whom his honor knew was one of the drol-lest creatures in all creation. She had start-ed the affair as a good joko, and joined in it for the fun of the thing, and to have a hearty laugh at tho locofoco's, when Sally had suc-ceeded in chousing them out of their pet pig. Justice.—I am afraid, Jack, the laugh will be on the wrong side of your mouth. Jack Register.—Tb&ta nothing, your Hon-or. I am used to laughing on that side for tho last seven years. Jacky Puddle stood on his dignity, and pledged his honor, that he was a perfect "Know Nothing" with regard to the entire affair, and invited all present to take a horn with him in the Executive mansion,—when ice got there. After some wrangling about the owner-ship of Ad, Mr. News was examined. He knew Ad from the hour it was pigged to the present, and had always known it as the property of Mr. Mosey; there wore a num-ber of persons who took a great interest in tho animal, but he couldn't swear thoy were joint proprietors. He had his suspicions, but "least said was soonest monded." In answer to tho accused, he stated, that ho al-ways considered Ad as "no great shakes," and had frequently told Mosey it was a vi-cious animal, that it would eventually kick up a muss in tho neighborhood. He had always thought there was more of the Black Republican than the Southern breed in it, and therefore kept his eye on it, and gave it a knock whenever he got a chance. Its hab-its were so pugnacious, that it was a terror to the neighbors; it had a peculiar animosi-ty to little niggers, and old darkies, Ad, as a public nuisance, which ought abated. The defendants wero then lib< it upon bail, and held responsible for the I behaviour of Ad, until the final decis |n the case, in August next. Our limited space prevents a fuller n) bat we have copious notes, which we publish another time. Some of the examinations were decidedly rich, rumored that tho defendants are all sick of their spec, but we doubt its trut^., as it is "neck or nothing" with them. No 'nat-ter how the affair ends, they cannot be v,,»raat off than before; if convicted, they wii be . pilloried and branded, bat that's n«.i ng, f they are too well attmt to such thing* to .WM .. for anything less than continued ras'ieo- j sion—from Office. From ihe Fayetteville Observer EQUAL TAXATION Having, on Thursday, by the poblicru'on of a portion of Gov. Graham's speech ini lhe State Senate in 1854, very effectually di*|xM. ed of the Democratic pretence that the \)liig measure of equal taxation would violate a compromise of tho Constitution, we protiose now to offer a few plain matter of ♦act ofin-r-vations on the nature of that proposed ni{ins-ure, and its obvious equity. The follo^fi ig is the portion of the Whig Platform wWi-h relates to this sabject: " Whereas, Great inequality exists in $ no present mode of taxation, and it is just #nd rigbt that all property should contribute* as proportion towards tho burdens of State J "1. Resolved, That we recommend a (in-vention of the people ot the State to be alli-ed on the federal basis as early as practica-ble for tho purpose of so modifying the (.(in-stitution that every species of property iJay be taxed according to us value, with poivr to discriminate only in favor of the na j e products of our State and tho industrial jLr-suits of her citizens." f The chief inequality, if not tho only £ne complained of is, that lands and other ob-jects of taxation are assessed according to their value, whilst negroes, now the Inrg ft single species of property in the State, :.,nd tho one most readily convertible into c-a(m, pay far less than their duo proportion, in-cording to their value. As was shown pj Gov. Graham, this concession was made'to tho slaveholders in 1835, as a consideni'jon for the concession to the landholders o inn exclusive representation in the State Se.. ie. Tbe reason for the concession no longer z-its. Democoacy has wrested from the li d-holders their part of the benefits of this ■ n promise, and there is therefore no reason Of continuing the unequal burden on them The average valuo of negroes between 12 and 50 years of age is at least S1000 each — Suppose one man to own ton such negn es, worth 910,000. Ho pays into the State tn\.n ury as tax on thorn. $8. His neighbor o*rn •10,000 worth of houses and lands, ant' lio pays on that $20 of State taxes. Is tl pre any reason for this inequality? Not ibut wo can perceive. Both are equally prote|jod in their rights, and sustained in tho valji-< of their respective species of property, bylhe very same government which is maim.'. 1 <i by the common fund of taxes thus colleeld. Out of this common fund the Executive lid Legislative and Judicial departments, mn I II else composing the government that piot«#Hs all alike, derive tbeir support. Without this government, to protect and secure tl. MO rights of property, neither lands nor sl-c> oa would be of value in North Carolina, BX<* pt ii* <K n-y. IO ir 'y it pans,4;c. It was a snapper op of chickens, among feather beds the views of his Delegation, and pledging a hearty concurrence in all movement looking towards lhe rights ol all sections of the Uni-ted States, and ot the common rights of all citizons in the States and Territories. Mi. Walker, of Alabama, moved the ap-pointment of a committee of ono from oath Delegation, to report a list of officers and rules tor tie permanont and perfect organi-zation of the convention. In accordance with this resolution, which was unanimous-ly adopted, the Chairman appointed the fol-lowing Committee: . . J. M.Pj.rur Alabama, B. Mathews^ M.ssis-sinpi, John Tarleton, Louisiana. W H. Whit-ely, Deleware, W. W. Fisher, Virginia, R. B. Boylston, South Carolina, J. M. Lamar Geor-so far as every individual could maintain rights by his own strong arm. Such h> tho undoubted fact, we put it to the i science of every fair man, of even pMM whether it is not equitable that those i equally receive protection, according to I respective necessities for it, should • qu pay for that protection, according to 1I4 respective amounts of interest protected Can any fair man whose property con* in negroes, really desire that his neigi whose property conai tin lands, shall pa} his protection in his negro property 1 cannot believe it. Who will be willing t his neighbor shall justly taunt him ■ avoiding his share of the public burdens; :fid throwing them upon ono who is no more aMe than himself to bear them, and yet i« ealyxi on to pay his own and more than half of Ms neighbor's share? On the other hand, wfat freeman will tamely submit thus to pay mis own and his equally rich neighbor's tn>l- ' It ought not to be desired and it will noilhe submitted to. But the case is far stronger than wo b\ stated it above. Tho owner of these i negroes, worth $10,000, is, on an aver;i| the owner of ten others, under 12 and ol 50 years of ago, who arc worth say $5," [by reference to the last census it will be s that just about one half of the negroes in the State are under 12 and over 50.] On $1. 0 worth of property, therefore, he pa\ whilst his neighbor, with $15,000 wort real estate, pays $30. We know it is that those under 12 and over 50 are exei ed because they are non-productive. 1 everybody knows is legal fiction. Man; those over 50 are among tho most produ negroes in the State, earning to their 1 ters from $100 to $500 a year; while well known and admitted, that cvery oiis| those under 12 is increasing in value at; rate of about $100 a year, and this $1' year is just as really aud truly $100 mad<| tho owner upon this little negra as is $100 produced by the labor of any ono of grown negroes. Now we put it to any man to say, whether any property tha a man owns pays him better than Ifcit $1' a year of increase in the value of each on 1 4 these little negroes? And if it is thus < fessedly productive property, why shoull not contribute its due proportion to tbe j| ment of the public burdens? If, on the er hand, any of the old or young shoaJdl by reason of any infirmity, a charge u'*n the owner, tney should not only not oe ItMe ed, but a proper deduction therefor should >c made from the aggregate valuation of tin who are taxed. But it is Baid that these little children may die without ever actually producing w y-thing. Very true; but that contingent) • n-cereiy hoped his'Honor would Teave the vi- ters into the estimate of their market v;} Je, cious animal in their possession. Mr. Mosey | which would be much higher i I >' to. fsr 0; en of aid pt-s of vo IB-is of 1* a y7 it ir anu pa and a ripper and tearer and furniture. He considered it a public nuisance, and was rejoiced when the defen-dants were so foolish as to steal it. He wished them joy of their bargain, and sin-entered his protest against the latter senti-ment. After a speech from Orator Gasbags, which we will report at a future period, his Honor decided to hold tho prisoners to bail for their appearance at August Court, and in the meantime would take into consideration whether it would not be necessary to indict. be any guaranty that they would not dij So also one's dwelling or store house orl tory, may constitute the chief value ot| taxable real estate. Tiiai is liable 1 Htrnction by fire, and it is as great s ; ary misfortune thus to lota lbs tn ihj fl the other by death But how is it with the land .' A: ere
Object Description
Title | The Greensborough patriot [May 11, 1860] |
Date | 1860-05-11 |
Editor(s) |
Sherwood, M.S. Long, James A. |
Subject headings | Greensboro (N.C.)--Newspapers |
Place | Greensboro (N.C.) |
Description | The May 11, 1860, issue of The Greensborough Patriot, a newspaper published in Greensboro, N.C., by M.S. Sherwood & James A. Long. |
Type | Text |
Original format | Greensborough [i.e. Greensboro], N.C. : Newspapers |
Original publisher | M.S. Sherwood & James A. Long |
Language | eng |
Contributing institution | UNCG University Libraries |
Newspaper name | The Greensborough Patriot |
Rights statement | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/ |
Additional rights information | NO COPYRIGHT - UNITED STATES. This item has been determined to be free of copyright restrictions in the United States. The user is responsible for determining actual copyright status for any reuse of the material. |
Object ID | 1860-05-11 |
Digital publisher | The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, University Libraries, PO Box 26170, Greensboro NC 27402-6170, 336.334.5304 |
Digitized by | Creekside Digital |
Sponsor | Lyrasis Members and Sloan Foundation |
OCLC number | 871562150 |
Page/Item Description
Title | Page 1 |
Full text |
s?l*6.
^
-m ■a •- ■■■ ■ ■† miian —* m runs atrai
5-5!
BT SHERWOOD & LONG. & jFamilB TSTrtospaper—JBebotefc to literature, &grieultUTe, manufactures, Commrrr?, atrti IfcisccUaneouB iEUabing. TERMS—$2.00 IN ADVANC*.
VOL. XXIII. GREENSBOEOTJGH, IN". C, MA.Y 11, 1B60. NO. 10864
The LrcensboTangK Patriot.
».»■
«OF-BWOOD. JAMES A. LCM1.
SHERWOOD & LONG,
EDITORS AND PROPRIETORS.
TEBMSt *2.4X> A YEAR, IW ADVAKCE.
KATES OF ADVERTISING IN THE PATRIOT.
fts-S dollar per square for the first week, and twenty-
. ceo'* t' r cvery week ,hereftfter- TWKLVB LINES oa
.. making u square. Deductions made in faror of
.• ;::.g matter as follows:
3 MONTHS. 6 MONTHS. 1 1MB
:.-:^:::::::-^».^SS::::::?SS
'..;.:..... 10 00 15 00 20 00
Discussion at Smilhfield Between
Messrs. Pool and Ellis!
GREAT ENTHUSIASM !
POQli TRIUMPHANT, AND ELLIS
COMPLETELY USED UP !
From the Raleigh Register.
The candidates for governor met at Smith-ed'on
the 25th, according to appointment.
' }ir. Po 1 opened the discussion by congrat-
_• himself that a new state of affairs
lately arisen, heretofore unprocented.—
. competitor and himself had agreed that
iiscussion between them was narrowed
to the simple question of ad valorem
• subject of ad valorem is easily unier-
. | it has been called by some a compli-
| juostion, but all who know right irora
og,are bound to admit that equal taxa-
. is just and right. What but the strong
arm of government secures to men the en-lit
and possession of their property,
ier slaves or not? And why should
rv man pay his equai proportion for
port of that government? Every cit-ighl
to pay tax according to the val-i
and protection afforded his property.—
To adjust the matter and to bring about e-zation
in the taxation fcs the prime ob-
• of thoso who favor ad valorem; but
me political screws ar o once placed on
of our people it is hard to convnee
-in oi the eror of their wa y, and influence
in to advocate this measure, although ov-rv
honest man is bound to admit its justice.
. present system of taxation is certainly
unjust and unequal—wo propose to change it
> as to make it boar equally on all species
of property, the r.egro included. It is no
v.- proposition-—ad valorem taxation is
■..;,!• obligatory in sixorsoven oftheSouth-u
States, that -enjoy more property than
seio—they have dono away with discrimi-
.•'•.-.• and unjust taxation, while in North
Jarolina we cannot tax slaves, known and
acknowledge to be|the most valuable species of
• srty among us, except as persons The
Aborftionists say they are persons, I sav
ey are property, and should, as such, be
.' i :ioeordi ng to value. With these facts
| ■•'. IJV * houhd not the slaveholder pay
ial pnjbortion with the landholder and
• or man for the support of tho govern-ment
and t'ae protection ol his property ?—
ii's platform proposes to bear equally
on all apocies ofproperty, tin cups and the
old lady'u hon and eggs, and all, except the
rich man's negro, while wo propose to tax
lOdy according to value, giving pow-tho
legislature to "discriminate only
r of the natural products of our land
• •industrial pursuits of our citizens."
competitor says that wo represent onr-
08 wishing to tax the negro in onescc-
1 other species of property in anoth-
I give this, as it deserves, a prompt de-
1 am in lavor of striking out tho odi-bibition
in regard to slaves in the Con-
Btitution, and of taxing all property accord-value,
leaving it to the legislature to
Bach discriminations as beforo men-
I \Y, are not hunting down the ne-
• are protecting tho slave, owner in
session of his property and making
• memting a fraternal bond between
slaveholder and non-slaveholder. But
life has a different tax for each class
iety. What more security for the pro-of
his property does the slave owner
than that his negro shall be taxed
'.;•' in protection with the land which
tills? N'oii-slaveholbers arc largely in
lajority here, and slaves are held by
th their consent. Thoy should not,
fore, be oppressed with onerous and un-
• irdens of taxation. Their good will
>i»I |