Page 001 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
Full Size
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
IPLANNINGBNQTESI NUMBER 23 27 AUGUST 1962 IAN I BlNFOPM^TIQNl IPi .\CAt\ON peensbopS EKS tllrlsftWI LET'S COMPARE . . .Greensboro with several other cities having essentially the same population but situated in varied geographic locations . These cities are: Portsmouth, Virginia; Columbus, Georgia-Alabama; Trenton, New Jersey; Topeka, Kansas; Lincoln, Nebraska; and Madison, Wisconsin. From data compiled by the Census Bureau, I960 enumeration, we are comparing Greensboro and the above mentioned cities by selected employment, educational, economic, housing and population characteristics . These comparisons are being made for the purpose of discovering similarities and differences between the cities. A proper interpretation of these factors will lead us to new insight of our community. Variations are brought about by manydiffer- ent factors. Industrial and commercial activities must be taken into account as well as demographic, climatic, physiographic and cultural factors. Also, factors pertaining moredirectly to the producation and exchange of agricultural and non-agricultural goods should be considered. One outstanding area of comparison is by labor force characteristics. These are comprised of data pertaining to employment status, occupation groups, and industry. In order to facilitate the comparisons being made, an explanation of these terms is warranted. Employment status is basically that data pertaining to the number of people in the labor force. For our purposes this includes both male and female, 14 years old and over employed and unemployed. Military personnel are not included here although census data does include them. Employment status may therefore IPEPAPTMETMT [GPEENSBORO E3 HD3 MMMMel be loosely defined as that portion of the available civilian labor force which is either employed or unemployed. The civilian labor force may, in turn, be sub- classified into occupation groups. These groups are merely classifications of particular fields of employment which are homogeneous. For example, in one grouping we will find professional and technical workers while another will categorize workers as craftsmen and foremen or perhaps as operatives. The divisions were made in accordance with the varying amounts of skill and/or aptitude necessary for the satisfaction of the job requirements. Occupation groups in turn, may be categorized into industry or industry titles. An industry category defines a particular industrial field and consists of a homogeneous group of industry titles. An individual maybe classified ina>n occupation group as a craftsman or foreman and have an industry title of textile and apparel products, this being the field inwhichhe is actively engaged. Therefore, we may say that employment status indicates the number of employed whereas occupation classification is concerned with skills and training to the product or function performed. In the following table employment status data has been compiled into male and female employed and unemployed and percentages of unemployment. Prepared by Mathey A. Davis Department of City Planning NOPTH CAROLINA I
Object Description
Title | Planning notes [Number 23, 27 August 1962] |
Date | 1962-08-27 |
Creator (group/organization) | Department of Planning, Greensboro, North Carolina |
Subject headings |
Land use -- North Carolina -- Greensboro Greensboro (N.C.) -- History -- 20th century |
Topics | Planning |
Place | Greensboro (N.C.) |
Description | Report prepared by Mathey A. Davis of the Department of City Planning which focuses on employment and occupation classification of persons in the Greensboro region. |
Type | Text |
Original format | newsletters |
Original publisher | Greensboro, N.C. : Department of Planning |
Language | en |
Contributing institution | Greensboro Public Library |
Source collection | Guilford Vertical Files (Greensboro Public Library) |
Folder | Planning -- City and County (1) |
Rights statement | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/ |
Additional rights information | NO KNOWN COPYRIGHT. This item is believed to be in the public domain but its copyright status has not been determined conclusively. |
Object ID | GPL_GVF.033.002 |
Date digitized | 2014 |
Digital access format | Image/jpg |
Digital publisher | The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, University Libraries, PO Box 26170, Greensboro NC 27402-6170, 336.334.5304 -- http://library.uncg.edu/ |
OCLC number | 893991962 |
Page/Item Description
Title | Page 001 |
Full text | IPLANNINGBNQTESI NUMBER 23 27 AUGUST 1962 IAN I BlNFOPM^TIQNl IPi .\CAt\ON peensbopS EKS tllrlsftWI LET'S COMPARE . . .Greensboro with several other cities having essentially the same population but situated in varied geographic locations . These cities are: Portsmouth, Virginia; Columbus, Georgia-Alabama; Trenton, New Jersey; Topeka, Kansas; Lincoln, Nebraska; and Madison, Wisconsin. From data compiled by the Census Bureau, I960 enumeration, we are comparing Greensboro and the above mentioned cities by selected employment, educational, economic, housing and population characteristics . These comparisons are being made for the purpose of discovering similarities and differences between the cities. A proper interpretation of these factors will lead us to new insight of our community. Variations are brought about by manydiffer- ent factors. Industrial and commercial activities must be taken into account as well as demographic, climatic, physiographic and cultural factors. Also, factors pertaining moredirectly to the producation and exchange of agricultural and non-agricultural goods should be considered. One outstanding area of comparison is by labor force characteristics. These are comprised of data pertaining to employment status, occupation groups, and industry. In order to facilitate the comparisons being made, an explanation of these terms is warranted. Employment status is basically that data pertaining to the number of people in the labor force. For our purposes this includes both male and female, 14 years old and over employed and unemployed. Military personnel are not included here although census data does include them. Employment status may therefore IPEPAPTMETMT [GPEENSBORO E3 HD3 MMMMel be loosely defined as that portion of the available civilian labor force which is either employed or unemployed. The civilian labor force may, in turn, be sub- classified into occupation groups. These groups are merely classifications of particular fields of employment which are homogeneous. For example, in one grouping we will find professional and technical workers while another will categorize workers as craftsmen and foremen or perhaps as operatives. The divisions were made in accordance with the varying amounts of skill and/or aptitude necessary for the satisfaction of the job requirements. Occupation groups in turn, may be categorized into industry or industry titles. An industry category defines a particular industrial field and consists of a homogeneous group of industry titles. An individual maybe classified ina>n occupation group as a craftsman or foreman and have an industry title of textile and apparel products, this being the field inwhichhe is actively engaged. Therefore, we may say that employment status indicates the number of employed whereas occupation classification is concerned with skills and training to the product or function performed. In the following table employment status data has been compiled into male and female employed and unemployed and percentages of unemployment. Prepared by Mathey A. Davis Department of City Planning NOPTH CAROLINA I |