Page 1 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
Full Size
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
EQUALITY AT THE BALLOT-BOX: EQUALITY AT THE TAX-BOX. By Sherwood & Long. GREENSBOROUGH, N. C, JULY 21, 1860. Number 11, M. S. SHERWOOD. JAMES A. LONO. SHERWOOD & LONG PUBLISHERS. Published Weekly, and to be Continued Three Months. PRICE TWENTY-FIVE CENTS. ADDRESS Sherwood & Long, Greensboro', IV. C. From the Fayetteville Observer. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS. The reader will find below a very plain and trntliful discussion of the ad valorem ques-tion. Of its merits the reader will judge for himself; and we think it will ensure his read-ing of it to inform him that it is so highly ap-preciated that 30,000 copies of it were printed at this office some da}-a ago—a larger number, wo suppose', than was ever printed of any oth-er pamphlet in North Carolina. Ad Valorem Explained by Questions and Answers. <J. What is the DEBT OF NORTH CAROLINA? A. The Slate owes 8J millions on bonds already issued. It will soon owe over 132 millions on liabilities already incurred. The ordinaryexponses of the government are on an average over §100,000 yearly. It is cer-tain the TAXES MUST SOON BE RAISED to at least 8800,001) to §000,000 annually, Q. Can this amount be equitably raised tin-dor the Democratic system of taxation? A. No. All kinds of property except slaves, household and kitchen furniture, horses, cat-tle, hogs, &c, are already taxed as high as '.hey can hear. Slaves hower are but lightly taxed. (^. What! SLAVES LIGHTLY TAXED? How do you prove that ? A. Why by the Comptroller's last Report, $203,000,000 ofslave property paid only 8118,- :,30, while 898,000,000 ot land paid $191,980. While land paid 20 els. on 81U0 value, slaves paid 5} Gts. While slaves paid one dollar, land paid three dollars and fifty cents. Q. Do I understand you to say land pays tear FOUR TIMES as miuh as slaves? A. Yes, land worth 81500 pays 83. A slave r-iochanic worth §1500 would be taxed 80 els. If the slave is over 50 years or under 12, HE WOULD PAY NOTHING. Q. Why does not the Legislature tax slaves higher? A. Because the Constitution forbids the taxation ot slaves under 12 years old and over 50. Slavos between 12 and 50 cau only be taxed as high as white men between 21 and 45. Q. What is the number of slavos in the State ? A. In 1850 there were 288.548; if they in-creased between 1850 and 1860 as they in-creased between 1840 and 1850 (17.38 per ct.) there must now bo 338,548—at $000 each worth 8*203,000,000. <^. What are the number and value of slave i■oils, i. e. those between 12 and 50. A. The Comptroller's Report has tho num-ber 147,913, but omits those of Edgecombe ; :.dd on these and wc have not less than 152,- «>00—worth at least 8130,000,000. These one hundred and thirty millions pay only $118,- 380, while 808,000,000 of land pays8191,980. tj. What are the numberand value of those -aves which cannot be taxed at all by the legislature? A. There must be 180,000, worth say 873,- 000,000. These 6eventy-three millions can't i c taxed at all, even ifthe State should be in-olved in an expensive war. <j Hut why not raise the tax on slaves be- ;ween 12 and 50, so as to make up for this loss ? A. Because the Constitution does not allow ihat to be done without raising the tax on the white man. White men are obliged to leave their business to serve as jurors, as witnesses, to tight our battles and for other pubiic du-ties. The poli tax is high enough already, perhaps too high. Q. But possibly slaves pay enough for COUNTY TAXES to make np this inequality. A. No. Land is taxed for county purposes —so are white men. In Wake county, land worth a little over 83,000,005 pays to County and State $13,611, while slaves worth over $6,000,000 pay only 87,474. Land in Wake pays 43 cents on the $100, slaves 11 cents. A nogro fellow worth $1500 pays $153; land worth $1500 pays $6 45 cents; OVER FOUR TIMES AS MUCn ! Q. Land pays four times as much as slaves ! but then, slaves get sick and die; does land get sick and die ? A. Yes; land gets overflowed, wears out, is attacked with drought, with worms and rust. Houses and turpentine trees and fen-ces are burnt. Ifland is not physicked with manure it soon dies. Q. But young slaves can't work, don't pro-duce anything : ought they be taxed ? A. Why not ? There were in the State in 185U, 5,453;975 acres of land improved, and 15,543,008 acres unimproved. In Wake, 161,- 091 improved, and 352,178 unimproved; yet all the unimproved land is taxed 20 cents on $100 value. Besides, little negroes increase more rapidly invaluethan any other investment. Q. What is the value of land and slaves combined, and what do they pay into the Treasury ? A. The value is in round numbers $300,- 000,000, and they paid 8305,880. An ad va-lorem tax of a little over 10 cents on 8100 would bring the same amount, by which the LAND TAX WOULD BE DIMINISHED ONE-HALF and a slave of the average value of8600 would pay about 60. Q.- Do the CONSTITUTIONS OF OTHER SOUTH-ERN STATES contain restrictions on taxing slaves ? ■ A. ONLY TWO. In Tennesse, none except those between 12 and 50 can be taxed, but thsy must be taxed ad valorem. In Virginia all property except slaves must be taxed accor-ding to value. Slaves over 12 years must be taxed as high as 8300 worth of land, and not higher. Q. Are there any other INEQUALITIES UN-DER THE LAST REVENUE BILL? A. Yes, many. The following table will show some": 80 57£ 80 2 00 2 40 5 00 16 00 10 00 7 50 10 00 100 00 50 00 40 00 10 00 Slaves on $1000 value, paid Taxable slsfVcs, " " Land, " « Money at interest, stocks, &c. ,; '• Goods bought, •' " Clothing, " « Watches, " " Piuioe, " " Buggies, Carryalls, kc. u " Liquors bought out of the State, t; 4: " bought in the State, '• '• Studs and Jacks, (say) »; " Meehanics, &C-, on thetr labor, " " Mr. Holden, in the IN". C. Standard of 20th June, says it was NECESSARY FOR THE DEMO-CRATIC PARTY TO PA8S THIS VERY LAW. Q What mechanics, overseers, &c. pay a heavy tax on their wages? A. Yes; a machaiiic making $500 pays $5 on his wages and 80 cents on his poll". A slavo mechanic working at the same bench, making$500, would pay 80 cents only.— If tho slave is over 50, he pays nothing. Q. I suppose, then, the white mechanic is free from all other taxes ? A. You aro mistaken. Every honest mer-chant will admit that ho charges his tax to his customers. That tax must bo paid wheth-er the goods rot on his shelves or are burnt. Q. Does that make tho PRICE OF SUGAR COF-F. EE, SALT, CALICO, and OTHER NECESSARIES HIGHER \ A. Certainly. Sugar, for example, cost | jug in Petersburg 7 or 8 cents, will be sold in Wake or Orange for 10 or 12 cents. Part of this high price is the tax. Q. Has the Democratic party provided a REMEDY for this unjust system of taxation ? A. None at all. In their platform they say "they deem it the DUTY of the Legisla-ture, in passing acts for raisins: revenue, so to I adjust taxation that it shall bear EQUALLY AS , PRACTICABLE, within the limits of tho Con-j stitution, 041 the VARIOUS INTERESTS and CLAS- ' BK8 of property in all sections of tho State." Q. Does this Democratic platform go for J taxing HOGS, DUCKS' CHXOKENs. &C ? A. It does. Hogs are "classes of proper-ty," so are chickens; and the platform says it is the duty of the Legislature to "bear upon them." Q. What is the meaning of the expression "within the limits of the Constitution ?" A. That taxation shall bear equally on ALL CLASSES EXCEPT ON SLAVES ; but taxation must not bear equally on slaves because they say it is,, premature, impolitic, dangerous and u n-just" to alter the Constitution. Q. What REMEDY does the CONSTITUTIONAL UNION PARTY propose ? A. They say the first thing to be done is to alter the Constitution so as to give the Legisla-ture the same power to tax slaves that they have to tax other property, and then to adopt the PRINCIPLE OF AD VALOREM TAXATION, with proper discrimination. Q. Does their Platform advocate the taxa-atior. of all property, such as hogs, ducks, chickens, &c? A. No : this charge is brought to turn away the attention of the people from the two hun-dred millions worth of slave property. Tho Legislature can tax these things now if they want to, but do not. They will never tax things so small in value that the expenses of collection will be more than tho tax. Q, But tho Democrats say you intend to abolish and increase the tax on tho CIRCUS, ON EXHIBITIONS, ON PEDLARS ON LICENSES TO RE TAIL and sueh things ; is that true ? A. That is not true. Such things are not taxed as property but as PRIVILEGES, or LI-CENSES ; the Legislature will still have full power over these things. Jnst so all COPORA-TIONS, as BANKS might be taxed for the exclu-sive privileges granted them. Q, Will the tax on BTLLIARDTABLES, PLAY-ING, CARDS, BOWLING, ALLEYS, DIRKS, and PIS-TOLS and su- h articles be necessarily reduced? A. By no means. The tax on sueh things is in the nature of a police regulation for the suppression of VICE or lor promoting die good order of the community. THE TAX, IS A PEn- ALTY. In Tennessee it is a crime to wear dirks, bowie knives an J pistols at all—wo on-impose a high tax Q,. Would the tax on MONEY be lowered necessarily ? A. No, if money is made to pay COUNTY, TAXES, it would «ot be lowered. Q,. Does the Constitutional Union Plat-form allow of discrimination ? A. Yea, in favor of tho NATIONAL PRO-DUCTS of the State and the INDUSTRIAL PUR-SUITS, of her citizens. a. What is the effect of this ? A. The Legislature may favor our own productions, and the industry of our people, by exompting some articles and by laying higher taxes on foreign products and luxur-ies, such as Champagne, French brandies &c. It may be very proper and necessary to tax more heavily articles made abroad, where the money is spent out of the State, than ar-ticles made here, where the money would be spent among North Carolina workmen. Q.. Have OTHER SOUTHERN STATES ADOPTED AD VALOREM in practice ? A. Yes, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Florida, Louisiana and Texas. So have Ar-kansas and Missouri, though the Legislature of Arkansas exempts slaves under 5 and over 60 years old; that of Missouri exempts those under three. The provissions ofthe constitu-tions of Tennessee and Virginia have been mentioned. Except in these two States the Legislature of all the States but North Caro-lina havepower to tax a 11 slaves. Shameful—Dishonorable. The Democratic papers in their despera-tion, are endeavoring to make the impression that Peter Adams, Esq., of Guilford, is an ab-olitionist. Will not the Whigs of Guilford, on the day of the election, show that they know how to resent such a gratuitous insult upon one of their fellow-citizens. Because Mr. Adorns is for Pool, and lives in Guilford, j orders have gone forth from head quarters, that ho must be hunted down. Whigs of Guilford, to your posts. Dffluclty Between Messrs- Pool and Ellis. The Raleigh Register publishes the follow-ing card in explanation of a difficulty which occured at Hendersonville between Messrs. Pool and Ellis : We were present at the discussion at Hen-dersonville on this day, between Gov Ellis and Mr. Pool, in which a personal difficulty occured; to preveni misrepresentation of tho circumstances, we deem it a duty to the pub-lic to make a brief statement of the facts. Mr. Pool in his opening speech stated, that it bad been reported that he was in favor of taxing tverthing, tin cups, &c. That his competitor did not say so himself, but only argued so, from the platform of Mr. Pool's party and Mr. Pool went on to remark, that anybody who charged him with being in favor or of advo-cating tbis thing, told a lie and he authori-zed every person presont to say that ho said so. Governor Ellis, when ho came to reply to this part of Mr. Pool's address, charged Mr. Pool with using such language as be would not have used in a rich man's parlor. Mr. Pool, in his rejoinder to this remark, said he did not know any other language which should bo used, when such a charge was made, and he would not hesitate to use such lan-guage in a rich man's parlor or any where else if it became necessary. Governor Ellis arose from his seat in an excited and menacing manner and said Mr. Pool was using language unbecoming a gentleman. Mr. Pool repliod you aro no gentleman, whereupon Gov. Ellis made at him, with his right hand extended, which Mr. Pool caught with his lett hand and drew back his right hand to strike when a gentleman caught Mr. Pool's right arm and prevented the bl^w—Mr. Pool being at the time standing at tho judge's seat, and Gov. Ellis standing below at the clerk's desk, with the judge's bench, (three feet high) between —when friends interposed and Mr. Pool went on with his remarks and ropeatod tho same thing in the same language a9 before, and said that Governor Ellis's conduct was unbe-coming tho Governor of tho State of North Carolina. That if he felt agrieved at any re-mark of hip, this was not the place or tho time or the manner to adjust such difficulties. That Governor Ellis knew who ho was and that he was responsible to him or any other gentle-man for any offence and was ready to settle such matters at any time and in any way.— That the Governor had not chosen the usual mode recognized by gentleman to settle such matters. Mr. Pool remarked that he did not wish his friends to become excited or take any part in the matter; that bo could settle it himself. Gov. Ellis said Mr. Pool's remark to his friends was gratutions, and that he was Governor of tbe State and could not fight.;— Mr. Pool replied that the law forbid every bo-dy from fighting, and the matter closed. JOHNMcLAIN, WILLIAM PATTON, A. MILLER, A. H.JONES, A..J McBRYER, T. W. TAYLOR, L.S. GASH, H. D. LEE, F.C.BYERS, SAM'L C. BRYSON, S. P. BRITTAIN, J.Y. BRYSON, Hendersonville, July 2,1860. m * ■ — . Out for Ad Valorem. The Standard in its last issue, accounting for the fact that Avery received a larger vote than he did, as a delegate to the Charleston Convention, gives as a reason, that Avery had just made a violent speech against ad valorem, and the altering of the Constitution so as to tax negroes, whreas it was known that he (Holden) was in favor of said alteration. So the Standard has as at last, come out for ad valorem. If the Standard was in favor of ad valorem at the State Convention, why is it, that he has been saying that it is "premature." "unjust"1 and "dangerous,." 9&~ See prospectus of tho "Times.''
Object Description
Title | The little ad [July 21, 1860] |
Date | 1860-07-21 |
Editor(s) |
Sherwood, M.S. Long, James A. |
Subject headings | Greensboro (N.C.)--Newspapers |
Place | Greensboro (N.C.) |
Description | The July 21, 1860, issue of The Little Ad, a newspaper published in Greensboro, N.C., by M.S. Sherwood & James A. Long, who also published the Greensborough Patriot. |
Type | Text |
Original format | Greensborough [i.e. Greensboro], N.C. : Newspapers |
Original publisher | M.S. Sherwood & James A. Long |
Language | eng |
Contributing institution | UNCG University Libraries |
Newspaper name | The Little Ad |
Rights statement | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/ |
Additional rights information | NO COPYRIGHT - UNITED STATES. This item has been determined to be free of copyright restrictions in the United States. The user is responsible for determining actual copyright status for any reuse of the material. |
Object ID | 1860-07-21 |
Digital publisher | The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, University Libraries, PO Box 26170, Greensboro NC 27402-6170, 336.334.5304 |
Digitized by | Creekside Digital |
Sponsor | Lyrasis Members and Sloan Foundation |
OCLC number | 871561882 |
Page/Item Description
Title | Page 1 |
Full text |
EQUALITY AT THE BALLOT-BOX: EQUALITY AT THE TAX-BOX.
By Sherwood & Long. GREENSBOROUGH, N. C, JULY 21, 1860. Number 11,
M. S. SHERWOOD. JAMES A. LONO.
SHERWOOD & LONG
PUBLISHERS.
Published Weekly, and to be Continued Three Months.
PRICE TWENTY-FIVE CENTS.
ADDRESS
Sherwood & Long, Greensboro', IV. C.
From the Fayetteville Observer.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS.
The reader will find below a very plain and
trntliful discussion of the ad valorem ques-tion.
Of its merits the reader will judge for
himself; and we think it will ensure his read-ing
of it to inform him that it is so highly ap-preciated
that 30,000 copies of it were printed
at this office some da}-a ago—a larger number,
wo suppose', than was ever printed of any oth-er
pamphlet in North Carolina.
Ad Valorem Explained by Questions and
Answers.
|