Page 1 |
Save page Remove page | Previous | 1 of 12 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
Full Size
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Masqueraders put on a show -page 3 WednesdSPMarch 27, 8:15 pm N.C. Sjnnphony with Emmanuel Ax, pianist Aycock Auditorium Mike Cross Sunday night, 8 pm, Aycock JJ \ Bloom County —page 5 s ^ The Carolinian Serving Student:* end the Academic Community Since 1887 Non-profit U.S. Postage PAID l.reeniboro. N.C. Permit No. 10 r -.1 I-..- B) Muih |l, 1W& vMj .,( North Carolina at Grrenahor,, (Hit a Miiry idea? C«ll UH .■' Jerry Williamson Security is misunderstood BY MICHAEL READ SUff WriUr "We're probably the moat misunderstood people on this cam-pus," says Jerry Williamson, head of Campus Security, "We're just trying to do the best job that we can under the existing circumstances." "They're watching me," one stu-dent commented. "Watching every move that I make, waiting for the slightest infraction so that they can haul me away." His buddy added, "I feel like they are monitoring my personal actions. Big Brother lives..." Perceptions of Campus Security like these are widespread among UNC-G students. It is somewhat alarming—are they real-ly watching?! An interview with Jerry Williamson proved that this is a misconception. "We're not here," Mr. Williamson states, "to police the students. We're here to protect the people and the property of this university." Campus law enforce-ment since the late Sixties has evolved into a highly specialized branch of law enforcement. "You don't see an F.B.I, agent out writing speeding tickets. That's not his job. You don't see a highway patrolman out investigating crime. That's not his job. His job is to give speeding tickets. A campus law en-forcer's job is to enforce the laws on campus and to protect the people and their property." One of the primary means of pro-viding protection that Campus Security employs is a high visibili-ty patrol. "You see police cars patroling the campus all the time. We have officers out there on foot. We're not hiding behind bushes, peeping on students to see what they're doing. We're there to see that something is not going to come down where a student is going to be harmed. We have a very low violent crime rate on this campus, and the reason is that we are constantly jerrv *» miaiuevH, uumui ui i ajapaa »eeariiy, itri a primary pro-blem security has as being aiiiuaderstood on the part of students. He maintains that security isn't out there trying to get students—they're trying to help students who an victims. visible. Of course, a student can misconstrue that and say, 'Oh, he's watching me.' We're not watching the students. We're there to see that they can do what they want to do and not be bothered." But is it really necessary for the police force to be so omnipresent? There don't seem to be that many students walking around looking for a face to smash or a girl to rape. Mr. Williamson assures us that it is not the students that Campus Security is necessarily concerned with. F.B.I, statistics show that ninety percent of the crimes committed on college campuses across the nation are by people that do not attend the institutions. "Students are not generally the perpetrators, they're the victims," remarks Mr. William-son. "All of the major problems that we have are what we call 'spillovers' from the city. It goes along with be-ing an urban campus. We find peo-ple wandering around here at night, they're obviously up to no good. It's a touchy situation. The Supreme Court has ruled that these people have every right to be on our cam-pus; it is a public university, paid for by the taxpayers. We can't place these people under arrest. This is the type of situation that calls for surveillance. Mr. Williamson is confident in his assertion that the UNC-G has as safe a campus as can be found in the North Carolina state school system. "So far this year, there have been three murders in Chapel Hill. We don't have that here. That is not to say that we won't have it tonight, but UNC-G is aa safe a place as you will find in this city. In every urban setting, there will be one pr two areas that you will not go into late at night. Would you expect a girl to walk alone down Tate street at three in the morning? Probably not. We don't recommend that here at UNC-G, or anywhere." So, the next time you see three police cars chasing someone across the golf course, or pouring out so-meone's bottle of Chablis, be thankful. "It's really difficult," Mr. Williamson concluded, "to walk a line between providing the proper amount of security for the campus, which meant police out on the streets and visible, and giving the appearance of a police state. We don't want to do that, we don't want students to think: Oh, gosh, everywhere I go there's a cop wat-ching me.' That's not true. What we are there for is to make sure that they can go wherever they need to go without having to be looking over their shoulder. It's forever walking a line, and it's a delicate thing. It bothers me a lot that it has to be that way. But it is obvious that is is effective. We have been very fortunate about violent crimes be-ing committed on this campus. It rarely occurs. Let us all be relieved." Senate reviews policy changes BY DOUG BRISTOL SUff Writer Reporting at last Tuesday's Senate meeting, the Committee on legislation recommended changing the Elections Board Policy so that Student Government candidates could not campaign for other can-didates. Committee chairman Bill Snedden explained that the new policy would prohibit ticket campaigning. The Committee on Legislation also recommended that Senator David Brown's legislation to extend the elections appeal period be drop-ped. The extension of the appeals service, during which questions on a candidate's eligibility are decided, was denied by the Committee on the grounds that it was non-feasible. In another report before the Senate, Appropriations Committee chairman David Nance requested $1170 for various activities of stu-dent organizations. All three re-quests were approved by the Senate. The UNC-G Student Health Center will receive $650 for its Fitness Festival, which will be held from April 22-26. The Chemistry Club received $70 to cover dinner and travel expenses for a guest speaker from the SBI, who will be speaking on Chemistry and Crime.. Money was also given to the Greek Week committee for an all-campus dance. $550 was alloted to pay for publicity, a DJ, security, and refreshments. These expenditures leave the Appropriations Commit-tee with $1900 left to give out dur-ing the rest of the semester. The Senate also voted to accept the Judicial Committee's recommen-dation to rescind its approval ot Felicia Smith's appointment to the Senate. Ricardo Rodriguez, Judicial Committee Chairman, explained that Ms. Smith had not attended any Senate meetings since her ap-proval and had not responded to notices asking why she had not at-tended. Ms. Smith was the representative of the School of Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance. In her Presidential report, Lori Tyson announced that there would be a conference in Atlanta on March 28-30 which she would like Senate representatives to attend. The sub-ject of the conference" is "Being a Black Student on a Predominately White Campus." Wendell Carter, making his Vice- Presidential report, commented on how people felt recent Senate meetings had been rather glum and asked the people in the room to smile at the person next to them. He also reminded the Senators that he would rule anyone doing homework during Senate meeting out of order and ask them to leave the room. The highlight of the evening was a parliamentary workshop. Parliamentarian Chuck Murph made the distinction between mak-ing an official motion and shaking one's arm. A mock debate was also held on whether or not a keg should be provided at each Senate meeting. In This Issue Spring Hinii plan, page 2 Maaqueraderi page 3 Editorial* page 4 llliiiim County page I The Grumbler page C Stellar run page 7 Mr. Jackaoa page 8 Basketball page I England l>inr> ... page 10 Ruggers fall page 11 Flexible Flyer .... page 12 Support the Arts Applewhite and Weaver to give readings Short story writer and novelist Gordon Weaver and poet James Ap-plewhite will give free, public readings in late March at UNC-G. The readings are a part of the 1985 Spring Visiting Writers Series sponsored by the Master of Fine Art* degree writing program in UNC-G's Department of English. On Tuesday. March 26, Weaver will read from his works at 4 p.m. in Sharpe Lounge of Elliott Univer-sity Center. A professor of English at Oklahoma State University, he is the author of three short story col-lections, including 'Getting Serious." He also is the recipient of the "Quarterly West" novella prize for 1984. Applewhite, director of the In-stitute of the Arts at Duke Univer-sity, will read on Thursday, March 28, at 4 p.m. in Alderman Lounge of Elliott Center. He has been the recipient of a Guggenheim Fellowship, and in 1981 he receiv- Applewhite ed the Roanoke-Chowan Poetry Award. His books include "Foresee-ing the Journey" and "Following Gravity." Gross named as Elliott lecturer BY DAVID BOREN Speci«l to lh« fmroluuu* The 1985 Harriet Elliott lecturer is Dr. Daniel Gross, an an-thropoligist by training, who is cur-rently at the National Science Foun-dation in Washington, D.C. He will be speaking at 8:00 pm on March 26th in Cone Ball Room, EUC. Dr. Gross' topic is on indigenous Kples of South America, but the jer issue he will be focusing on is the nature of cultural identity. Dr. Gross challenges the propen-sity of scientists and laymen alike to treat cultural identity as something we carry around with us, like baggage. In an interview on Wednesday, March 13th, Dr. Gross specified why he feels that the metaphors society uses to talk about culture are inappropriate. Rather than baggage, tie said, culture is more like a contract which is con-stantly being renegotiated. Further more, the importance of recogniz-ing our inclination to identify culture as baggage is important if we are to prevent our perceptions of cultural identity from leading us into confusion and wrong decisions about dealing with people. The first step towards decreasing society's inclination towards confu-sion, according to Gross, is the recognition that "cultural identity is something that changes constant-ly. Groups of people are always picking up new identities and discarding other features." In elaboration, Gross believes that a group's cultural identity has a lot to do with the way people present themselves. The problem, says Gross, is thst society believes that it isolates its perceptions of a group from social and political decisions which are being made, when actual ly the two are inseparable. "There are convenient ways of labeling peo-ple, but we must recognize their in-accuracy and their potential effect on political and social decisions." Drawing on his experience in Brazil, which is extensive, Dr. Gross sees similiarities between Brazilian Indians and North American In-dians before the United States was settled. "We have attributed an identity to these people , for exam-ple, that they are closer to nature." Dr. Gross uses the term "we", he says, to denote urban society. "There are both good and bad results of the identity we assign In-dians," he continues, "because we admire people who are close to nature, but at the same time we see them as less sophisticated, less capable, and uninterested in progress. As a result of the cultural identi-ty urban society imposes on Indians, the Indians assume it, in order to accomplish what they, as a people, want to achieve. The example Gross gives is the attempt of the Brazilian Indians to exploit the perception that they are close to nature in order to legitimize their claims to land. The problem arises when society begins to make decisions based on inaccurate perceptions of a group's identity. Gross believes, "in reality, identity is arrived at through interaction, but the iden-tities people use are tailor made. If we perceived the degree to which cultural identity relates to interac-tion between peoples, then we would more clearly understand the goals people have." A familiar sight in London—Westminster Abbey. For more photographs of London, see page 10.
Object Description
Title | The Carolinian [March 21, 1985] |
Date | 1985-03-21 |
Editor/creator | Corum, Mark, A. |
Subject headings |
University of North Carolina at Greensboro--Newspapers College student newspapers and periodicals-- North Carolina--Greensboro Student publications--North Carolina--Greensboro Student activities--North Carolina--History |
Place | Greensboro (N.C.) |
Description | The March 21, 1985, issue of The Carolinian, the student newspaper of The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. |
Type | Text |
Original format | Newspapers |
Original publisher | Greensboro, N.C. : The University of North Carolina at Greensboro |
Language | eng |
Contributing institution | Martha Blakeney Hodges Special Collections and University Archives, UNCG University Libraries |
Publication | The Carolinian |
Rights statement | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/ |
Additional rights information | NO COPYRIGHT - UNITED STATES. This item has been determined to be free of copyright restrictions in the United States. The user is responsible for determining actual copyright status for any reuse of the material. |
Object ID | 1985-03-21-carolinian |
Date digitized | 2011 |
Digital publisher | The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, University Libraries |
Digitized by | Creekside Digital |
Sponsor | Lyrasis Members and Sloan Foundation |
OCLC number | 871559047 |
Page/Item Description
Title | Page 1 |
Full text | Masqueraders put on a show -page 3 WednesdSPMarch 27, 8:15 pm N.C. Sjnnphony with Emmanuel Ax, pianist Aycock Auditorium Mike Cross Sunday night, 8 pm, Aycock JJ \ Bloom County —page 5 s ^ The Carolinian Serving Student:* end the Academic Community Since 1887 Non-profit U.S. Postage PAID l.reeniboro. N.C. Permit No. 10 r -.1 I-..- B) Muih |l, 1W& vMj .,( North Carolina at Grrenahor,, (Hit a Miiry idea? C«ll UH .■' Jerry Williamson Security is misunderstood BY MICHAEL READ SUff WriUr "We're probably the moat misunderstood people on this cam-pus," says Jerry Williamson, head of Campus Security, "We're just trying to do the best job that we can under the existing circumstances." "They're watching me," one stu-dent commented. "Watching every move that I make, waiting for the slightest infraction so that they can haul me away." His buddy added, "I feel like they are monitoring my personal actions. Big Brother lives..." Perceptions of Campus Security like these are widespread among UNC-G students. It is somewhat alarming—are they real-ly watching?! An interview with Jerry Williamson proved that this is a misconception. "We're not here," Mr. Williamson states, "to police the students. We're here to protect the people and the property of this university." Campus law enforce-ment since the late Sixties has evolved into a highly specialized branch of law enforcement. "You don't see an F.B.I, agent out writing speeding tickets. That's not his job. You don't see a highway patrolman out investigating crime. That's not his job. His job is to give speeding tickets. A campus law en-forcer's job is to enforce the laws on campus and to protect the people and their property." One of the primary means of pro-viding protection that Campus Security employs is a high visibili-ty patrol. "You see police cars patroling the campus all the time. We have officers out there on foot. We're not hiding behind bushes, peeping on students to see what they're doing. We're there to see that something is not going to come down where a student is going to be harmed. We have a very low violent crime rate on this campus, and the reason is that we are constantly jerrv *» miaiuevH, uumui ui i ajapaa »eeariiy, itri a primary pro-blem security has as being aiiiuaderstood on the part of students. He maintains that security isn't out there trying to get students—they're trying to help students who an victims. visible. Of course, a student can misconstrue that and say, 'Oh, he's watching me.' We're not watching the students. We're there to see that they can do what they want to do and not be bothered." But is it really necessary for the police force to be so omnipresent? There don't seem to be that many students walking around looking for a face to smash or a girl to rape. Mr. Williamson assures us that it is not the students that Campus Security is necessarily concerned with. F.B.I, statistics show that ninety percent of the crimes committed on college campuses across the nation are by people that do not attend the institutions. "Students are not generally the perpetrators, they're the victims," remarks Mr. William-son. "All of the major problems that we have are what we call 'spillovers' from the city. It goes along with be-ing an urban campus. We find peo-ple wandering around here at night, they're obviously up to no good. It's a touchy situation. The Supreme Court has ruled that these people have every right to be on our cam-pus; it is a public university, paid for by the taxpayers. We can't place these people under arrest. This is the type of situation that calls for surveillance. Mr. Williamson is confident in his assertion that the UNC-G has as safe a campus as can be found in the North Carolina state school system. "So far this year, there have been three murders in Chapel Hill. We don't have that here. That is not to say that we won't have it tonight, but UNC-G is aa safe a place as you will find in this city. In every urban setting, there will be one pr two areas that you will not go into late at night. Would you expect a girl to walk alone down Tate street at three in the morning? Probably not. We don't recommend that here at UNC-G, or anywhere." So, the next time you see three police cars chasing someone across the golf course, or pouring out so-meone's bottle of Chablis, be thankful. "It's really difficult," Mr. Williamson concluded, "to walk a line between providing the proper amount of security for the campus, which meant police out on the streets and visible, and giving the appearance of a police state. We don't want to do that, we don't want students to think: Oh, gosh, everywhere I go there's a cop wat-ching me.' That's not true. What we are there for is to make sure that they can go wherever they need to go without having to be looking over their shoulder. It's forever walking a line, and it's a delicate thing. It bothers me a lot that it has to be that way. But it is obvious that is is effective. We have been very fortunate about violent crimes be-ing committed on this campus. It rarely occurs. Let us all be relieved." Senate reviews policy changes BY DOUG BRISTOL SUff Writer Reporting at last Tuesday's Senate meeting, the Committee on legislation recommended changing the Elections Board Policy so that Student Government candidates could not campaign for other can-didates. Committee chairman Bill Snedden explained that the new policy would prohibit ticket campaigning. The Committee on Legislation also recommended that Senator David Brown's legislation to extend the elections appeal period be drop-ped. The extension of the appeals service, during which questions on a candidate's eligibility are decided, was denied by the Committee on the grounds that it was non-feasible. In another report before the Senate, Appropriations Committee chairman David Nance requested $1170 for various activities of stu-dent organizations. All three re-quests were approved by the Senate. The UNC-G Student Health Center will receive $650 for its Fitness Festival, which will be held from April 22-26. The Chemistry Club received $70 to cover dinner and travel expenses for a guest speaker from the SBI, who will be speaking on Chemistry and Crime.. Money was also given to the Greek Week committee for an all-campus dance. $550 was alloted to pay for publicity, a DJ, security, and refreshments. These expenditures leave the Appropriations Commit-tee with $1900 left to give out dur-ing the rest of the semester. The Senate also voted to accept the Judicial Committee's recommen-dation to rescind its approval ot Felicia Smith's appointment to the Senate. Ricardo Rodriguez, Judicial Committee Chairman, explained that Ms. Smith had not attended any Senate meetings since her ap-proval and had not responded to notices asking why she had not at-tended. Ms. Smith was the representative of the School of Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance. In her Presidential report, Lori Tyson announced that there would be a conference in Atlanta on March 28-30 which she would like Senate representatives to attend. The sub-ject of the conference" is "Being a Black Student on a Predominately White Campus." Wendell Carter, making his Vice- Presidential report, commented on how people felt recent Senate meetings had been rather glum and asked the people in the room to smile at the person next to them. He also reminded the Senators that he would rule anyone doing homework during Senate meeting out of order and ask them to leave the room. The highlight of the evening was a parliamentary workshop. Parliamentarian Chuck Murph made the distinction between mak-ing an official motion and shaking one's arm. A mock debate was also held on whether or not a keg should be provided at each Senate meeting. In This Issue Spring Hinii plan, page 2 Maaqueraderi page 3 Editorial* page 4 llliiiim County page I The Grumbler page C Stellar run page 7 Mr. Jackaoa page 8 Basketball page I England l>inr> ... page 10 Ruggers fall page 11 Flexible Flyer .... page 12 Support the Arts Applewhite and Weaver to give readings Short story writer and novelist Gordon Weaver and poet James Ap-plewhite will give free, public readings in late March at UNC-G. The readings are a part of the 1985 Spring Visiting Writers Series sponsored by the Master of Fine Art* degree writing program in UNC-G's Department of English. On Tuesday. March 26, Weaver will read from his works at 4 p.m. in Sharpe Lounge of Elliott Univer-sity Center. A professor of English at Oklahoma State University, he is the author of three short story col-lections, including 'Getting Serious." He also is the recipient of the "Quarterly West" novella prize for 1984. Applewhite, director of the In-stitute of the Arts at Duke Univer-sity, will read on Thursday, March 28, at 4 p.m. in Alderman Lounge of Elliott Center. He has been the recipient of a Guggenheim Fellowship, and in 1981 he receiv- Applewhite ed the Roanoke-Chowan Poetry Award. His books include "Foresee-ing the Journey" and "Following Gravity." Gross named as Elliott lecturer BY DAVID BOREN Speci«l to lh« fmroluuu* The 1985 Harriet Elliott lecturer is Dr. Daniel Gross, an an-thropoligist by training, who is cur-rently at the National Science Foun-dation in Washington, D.C. He will be speaking at 8:00 pm on March 26th in Cone Ball Room, EUC. Dr. Gross' topic is on indigenous Kples of South America, but the jer issue he will be focusing on is the nature of cultural identity. Dr. Gross challenges the propen-sity of scientists and laymen alike to treat cultural identity as something we carry around with us, like baggage. In an interview on Wednesday, March 13th, Dr. Gross specified why he feels that the metaphors society uses to talk about culture are inappropriate. Rather than baggage, tie said, culture is more like a contract which is con-stantly being renegotiated. Further more, the importance of recogniz-ing our inclination to identify culture as baggage is important if we are to prevent our perceptions of cultural identity from leading us into confusion and wrong decisions about dealing with people. The first step towards decreasing society's inclination towards confu-sion, according to Gross, is the recognition that "cultural identity is something that changes constant-ly. Groups of people are always picking up new identities and discarding other features." In elaboration, Gross believes that a group's cultural identity has a lot to do with the way people present themselves. The problem, says Gross, is thst society believes that it isolates its perceptions of a group from social and political decisions which are being made, when actual ly the two are inseparable. "There are convenient ways of labeling peo-ple, but we must recognize their in-accuracy and their potential effect on political and social decisions." Drawing on his experience in Brazil, which is extensive, Dr. Gross sees similiarities between Brazilian Indians and North American In-dians before the United States was settled. "We have attributed an identity to these people , for exam-ple, that they are closer to nature." Dr. Gross uses the term "we", he says, to denote urban society. "There are both good and bad results of the identity we assign In-dians," he continues, "because we admire people who are close to nature, but at the same time we see them as less sophisticated, less capable, and uninterested in progress. As a result of the cultural identi-ty urban society imposes on Indians, the Indians assume it, in order to accomplish what they, as a people, want to achieve. The example Gross gives is the attempt of the Brazilian Indians to exploit the perception that they are close to nature in order to legitimize their claims to land. The problem arises when society begins to make decisions based on inaccurate perceptions of a group's identity. Gross believes, "in reality, identity is arrived at through interaction, but the iden-tities people use are tailor made. If we perceived the degree to which cultural identity relates to interac-tion between peoples, then we would more clearly understand the goals people have." A familiar sight in London—Westminster Abbey. For more photographs of London, see page 10. |